Label TAG (Temporal AGgregation): Capturing Dynamic Learning Ability in Label Aggregation
Connor Douglas , Calvin Isley, Aditya Krishnamachar
Abstract:
Algorithmic agents are used in a variety of competitive decision settings today, most notably to make competitive pricing decisions in contexts that range from online retail to residential home rental. We study the emergent behavior of competing agents using simple machine learning algorithms, when they are not even aware they are engaged in strategic interaction. We use a general-form repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma game as our model of strategic interaction. Agents engage in on-line learning with no prior model of game structure, knowledge of competitors, or observation of competitors’ actions. Our primary question is: absent any knowledge of the existence of the game or ability to pursue complex strategies like those that underlie game-theoretic “folk theorems,” when will agents nonetheless learn to collude?
We show that context-free bandits with no knowledge of their game environment and no time discounting can still consistently learn collusive behavior, an outcome we call “naive collusion.” Specifically, we prove that all symmetric and deterministic bandit learning algorithms will always converge to a collusive equilibrium. We further show that this finding is sensitive to the deterministic nature of these algorithms. In particular, we also prove that particular families of non-deterministic algorithms—which include the textbook epsilon-greedy algorithm—will never converge to a collusive equilibrium. Extensive simulations illustrate a range of outcomes under varying levels of stochasticity in the bandit algorithms.